Which two views does the Iteration Review provide into the program? (Choose two)

The Iteration Review is a crucial component of the SAFe framework, providing valuable insights into the team's performance during an iteration. One of the primary views it offers is how the team did on the iteration. This includes assessing the completed work against the iteration goals, understanding the quality of deliverables, and gathering feedback from stakeholders. It reflects the team's ability to execute plans, adapt to challenges, and achieve objectives set for that specific time frame.

In addition to this, another significant view provided by the Iteration Review is how the team is doing on the Program Increment. This allows stakeholders to understand not just the isolated performance of a single iteration but also how that performance contributes to the broader goals of the Program Increment. It highlights the alignment of the team's output with the overall strategic objectives of the organization and offers a way to assess the progress of value delivery over multiple iterations.

Both of these views are essential for continuous improvement and alignment within a SAFe environment, enabling teams to identify areas needing attention and to celebrate achievements, thereby fostering an environment of transparency and teamwork. This context is critical because, while the total time taken for the iteration and the financial cost of the iteration are relevant metrics, they do not provide insights into team performance or progress toward overarching goals,