Which two factors are considered when determining the priority of work using Weighted Shortest Job First?

In the context of Weighted Shortest Job First (WSJF), the primary focus is on understanding the concept of Cost of Delay, which captures the potential negative impact of delaying a particular piece of work. This idea emphasizes that not all tasks are created equal; some have a higher cost associated with their delay, which could impact overall business value, customer satisfaction, or strategic alignment. When determining the priority of work, assessing the Cost of Delay allows teams to make informed decisions about which tasks would deliver the most value if completed sooner.

The methodology also factors in other dimensions that impact prioritization, such as estimating the urgency or value of the work relative to how long it will take to complete. In this way, understanding the Cost of Delay supports teams in prioritizing tasks in a manner that maximizes value and efficiency across the portfolio. This focus on the cost associated with delaying work helps organizations make strategic decisions that align with business objectives and urgency.

While elements like impact on revenue, task duration, and team capacity are relevant to overall project management, they don't directly influence the WSJF prioritization model as prominently as Cost of Delay does. For instance, team capacity might influence how much work can be taken on, but the direct prioritization based on value delivery is