As an advocate for SAFe trying to convince your organization to consider a change, which approach can be effective?

Using an economic view to advocate for SAFe is particularly effective because it allows you to present the potential return on investment and overall cost-effectiveness of implementing SAFe practices. This perspective emphasizes quantifiable metrics such as improved productivity, reduced waste, and faster time-to-market, making a compelling case for change that resonates with decision-makers focused on financial outcomes.

In contrast to other approaches, the economic view goes beyond surface-level benefits by grounding arguments in an analysis of both short-term costs and long-term gains. It helps to create a solid business case that informs stakeholders about how adopting SAFe can contribute to improved performance and competitive advantage over time. This approach also aligns well with the principles of Lean-Agile methodologies, which seek to optimize the flow of value while minimizing resource usage.

Other perspectives, while valuable, may not capture the comprehensive financial implications of the change as effectively as the economic view does. Therefore, focusing on the economic impact is likely to resonate more with organizational leaders and enhance the prospects for adoption of SAFe practices.